Independent identity references
Public court, government & human-rights records
Selected court, government and human-rights records that help verify the professional identity and recorded professional activity of Advocate Bishwa Kumar Jain. These references are not presented as endorsements or claims about case outcomes.
Verification
Publicly accessible references
- Delhi Government CMAWS – eligible advocate recordThe published list contains the name Bishwa Kumar Jain and Bar Council of Delhi enrolment D/5361/2018.
- Delhi High Court – supplementary cause list dated 7 January 2026The public cause list contains Bishwa Kumar Jain in the advocate details of a listed matter.
- Delhi High Court – cause list dated 8 September 2023The public cause list contains Bishwa Kumar Jain in advocate details for a criminal matter.
- Akash Tanwar v. GNCT of Delhi – Delhi High Court order, 1 May 2024The appearance section records Mr. Bishwa Kumar Jain, Advocate.
- LinkedIn professional profileProfessional profile identifying advocacy experience and the project “Guest Lecturer Delhi Police”.
National Human Rights Commission
NHRC Case No. 22/14/3/2023 · Manipur, 2023
An official National Human Rights Commission communication dated 24 May 2023 records that the complaint / intimation dated 10 May 2023 was received from ADV BISHWA KUMAR JAIN in respect of Auztynn Shimray and others. The corresponding NHRC diary number is 7644/IN/2023.
The Commission recorded that the complaint was transmitted to the concerned authority for appropriate action. The authority was directed to take appropriate action within eight weeks, associate the complainant / victim, and inform them of the action taken. The NHRC communication records that the case was closed after those directions were issued.
- NHRC Case No.
- 22/14/3/2023
- Diary No.
- 7644/IN/2023
- Complaint date
- 10 May 2023
- NHRC communication
- 24 May 2023
- Recorded complainant
- ADV BISHWA KUMAR JAIN
Interpretation: this entry records the procedural directions contained in the NHRC communication. It does not state that the Commission adjudicated the underlying allegations on merits, nor is it presented as an endorsement or a claim of success.
Privacy: the underlying diary record contains personal details of individuals affected by the violence. Those details are intentionally not reproduced on this website beyond what is necessary to identify the official case record.